Review: Writers of the Future, Vol. 31

Posted: May 4, 2015 by in Books that are Mediocre (3/5 single_star) Meta: David Farland (Ed), Fantasy, Science Fiction, Anthology, Short Fiction

Writers of the Future is quite easily one of, if not the, most prestigious contests in the world for speculative short fiction. The contest runs each quarter of the year, with the top three stories in the bunch being awarded with publication in the anthology, a place-dependent cash prize, royalties on the anthology they are published in (I believe), and a free week-long writing retreat with all of the new authors published in the anthology being taught by a large cadre of impressive, published authors. It’s no small thing, this “little” contest. If you’re a new writer, you should absolutely be starting off by sending your short stories there. Start at the top, I always say. Don’t short-change yourself by starting anywhere else. If you’re not a new writer though, and you find yourself picking this anthology up, you can be sure to find lots of interesting Science Fiction to satiate your palette.

The 31ST VOLUME OF THE WRITERS OF THE FUTURE ANTHOLOGY (Amazon) is exactly what I expected it to be: a solid collection of science fiction stories or stories written with a science fictional flair (yes, even the fantasy), with an emphasis on good writing. This is pretty much a definition that I’ve come to associate with the anthologies of the past, and my personal opinion.

The contest and I have had a fairly strong love-hate relationship since I first became aware of it. For a handful of years, I submitted stories to the contest every quarter. New story each quarter. I got a bunch of quarterfinalist awards, a few semi-finalist, but never anything more. Never breaking through to the coveted finalist position. To try and figure out exactly what I might be doing wrong (and at the behest of many of the published authors touting the contest) I started reading the anthologies. I read every story from volumes 18 through 26, and I found that although there was a certain sort of consistency to them, it wasn’t necessarily my cup of tea.

In this volume there were thirteen stories, with the twelve quarterly winners and one published finalist (which happens occasionally based on the length of the stories that won). Among the stories, my opinion was pretty split with four a-piece in the Like, Mediocre, and Didn’t Like categories, leaving one for my coveted Love. There were also a few essays/stories from some of the published authors associated with the contest. In general, I wasn’t very impressed with any of the extra content. Although, Orson Scott Card’s essay on why he thinks short fiction has died off and why it is yet so vitally important was really quite good.

So how ’bout those stories? I’ll highlight a few of the ones that made the biggest impact with me.

“Stars That Make Dark Heaven Light” by Sharon Joos – This was easily the story that most prominently stood up and screamed that it was science fiction. It was about a girl in an off-earth colony that is struggling with a dwindling population who makes a connection with an individual from an alien species that changes her life completely. It dealt with issues of doing things for the good of the community, what it means to be human, and the importance of fiction in our culture. Very good writing. It was everything science fiction is supposed to be. It was also overly long, incredibly sparse on character, and rather boring.

“Between Screens” by Zach Chapman – This was my second favorite story of the anthology and was also the published finalist in the group. Go figure. A kid living on a space station is ditching out on school to go skipping across the universe with his friends to catch glimpses of planet-ending catastrophes. They hit low-use stations and hack the local telescope to view the destruction. As time passes, the gig gets more popular. The only thing this story lacked was an ending. Lots of fun otherwise.

“Half Past” by Samantha Murray – Very well-written story about a girl that subconsciously creates echoes of herself in times of extreme emotion. Each of them lasts for years and are stuck in the time immediately around their creation. The previous night, she had a fight with her father, and has decided to leave his house. Thus she’s going around the house saying goodbye to her echoes, and the life she’s known, when her aunt shows up at the front door to do a bit more than just say hello. Really quite good and my favorite story of the bunch.

“Twelve Minutes to Vinh Quang” by Tim Napper– This could have been another contender for my favorite story, but it also lacked any kind of an ending. Grumble. This one was about a girl trying to help purchase passage for refugees into the country, and she has to distract two unexpected government officers long enough to let her contact transfer the payments through the proper channels as they all sit at a table in a restaurant. As you can probably tell from my description, his one really didn’t depend much on the science fiction elements, but they were there in the story. Still, it felt more like the first chapter of a book, and that kinda rubbed me the wrong way as this is a contest for short stories.

Another round of newbie authors from the WRITERS OF THE FUTURE anthology. A typical range of great and not, but all well written. Author hopefuls, take note

In general, I think if you’re a lover of science fiction, you’ll find that this anthology has quite a lot of intriguing stuff to offer. It’s fun to see the cream of the newest stuff brought together in a single place. I do wish that the anthology had more fantasy in the mix, but as I mentioned before this is really a science fiction anthology, and that’s mostly what you’ll find.

Regardless, if you’re a new author, you should check this out. It can seriously bring you nothing but good.

  • Recommended Age: 16+, I guess. Although see my comment about sex.
  • Language: A fair amount in some stories, but not used profusely. F-words sparingly in one story.
  • Violence: Death and some description of its means.
  • Sex: Moderately-detailed alien sex with a minor; a couple other sex scenes that are low detail but were a bit more than I expected for a


  • Martin L. Shoemaker says:

    A small note: the anthology publication does not pay royalties. Instead it pays pro market rate per word. In my very limited experience, anthologies tend to do either/or: royalties (and token payment against royalties) or pro rates (and no royalties).

    And thank you for a very honest review! I think those sell more books than reviews that bend over to only say good things.

    • Writer Dan says:

      Ah, stylin. I probably should have tried to find some documentation somewhere that talked about the “other” money that the authors got in association with their win, but I failed to make it before my deadline for this review. I knew there was something else financial they got and vaguely remembered it, for some reason, as royalties. Thanks for the correction, Martin. And you’re welcome for the review. We always do our best to stay honest here. Best of luck with your future endeavors!

  • Zach says:

    Thanks for the review!

    • Writer Dan says:

      You’re absolutely welcome, Zach. I’ll go out on a limb and guess that you’re probably the author of “Between Screens”, in which case, might I throw a hearty Thank You in your direction for writing such a dang cool story. Love to find stuff like yours in these anthologies. We need more science fiction authors that write great character-based stories. Now go write us some more! 🙂 Best.

  • ray4115 says:

    Great Reviews, thanks for taking the time to write and post. I am curious about what you consider a “good ending” and is it something specific you are looking for or more of a feeling of some sort? As a writer of dark and speculative fiction I often have problems ending an “idea” story.


    • Writer Dan says:

      “Good” for me means that I feel satisfied at the end with what I got based on what was promised to me along the way, which kind of implies that the rest of the story was “good” as well. Like, say, for a Dresden novel (just finished one–thus…), I typically expect a crazy convergence of events, character impact, and a few loose threads. I expect these things because most of his novels start with four or five things showing up at the same time, because the main character’s voice is so intimately expressive about who and why he is, and because this is kind of what I’ve come to expect from his previous novels.

      When it comes to an “idea” story, you have to ask yourself (as an author) “what does my story promise to its readers?”

      If the promise (what the story relays, not necessarily what the idea is) is despair (as it so often is in dark fantasy), perhaps show a ray of hope. Please note that in the larger scheme of things, it doesn’t have to be a valid ray of hope, but it’s usually a good idea to end a story on an upbeat of some sort, in my opinion.

      If it promises violence, provide plenty of violence.

      If it promises knowledge (as in a mystery), provide understanding.

      If it’s about fixing a problem, maybe an unexpected consequence

      If you only want to relay an idea, then it’s my opinion that you need a good character story to go along with it, and the story needs to be about the character dealing with the results/consequences of the “idea” of the story. Or even their own personal problem as it’s inextricably tied to, or around, the idea of the story. I think this is one of the main reasons behind why I end up disliking so much Science Fiction. Because so often the story is only “about the idea”, and personally I don’t care a lick about the idea unless the character story is solid.

      Sorry, you kind of got my answer via mini-novella info-dump. Hope something that I’ve said was an answer like you were hoping for.

      • ray4115 says:

        This is excellent information and I thank you for it. I suppose that it is pretty common knowledge, but when the story is being born it is sometimes difficult to remember all the technical. Emotion takes the fore and it is hard to step back and say, “What’s that really sound like?” I would think this ability to objectively appraise your work and see its deficiencies is one of the things that separates amateurs from professionals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *