Review: The Book of Lost Things
Once upon a time, there was a boy named David, and he did everything to keep his mother alive. So begins THE BOOK OF LOST THINGS by John Connelly, the story of a 12-year-old boy who tries to escape a life of trauma and disappointment only to discover that fairytales aren’t all they’re cracked up to be.
Early on in the book David loses his mother, his father remarries, and has a child with his new wife, Rose. David doesn’t like these changes and hides himself away in his bedroom. There the books have begun to whisper to him, and his imagination begins to take on a realism of its own. One day David discovers an intruder in his house, but no one believes him. He calls this sinister character The Crooked Man and is wary of his motivations. One fateful night, David inadvertently finds a doorway to an alternate world, where fairytales are grim, dark, and deadly. There he meets The Crooked Man face-to-face.
The story follows David’s adventures as he works his way through this fairytale realm, meeting a woodsman, big bad wolves, knights on horseback, and a plethora of vivid and terrifying characters. He must find his way to the king and the book of lost things in order to find his way home. But the odds of David surviving the journey are pretty low.
The story moves at a consistent pace, despite a great deal of worldbuilding as David moves through this alternate universe. The majority of the book takes place in a forest, filled with cursed creatures, villagers whose lives are threatened, and monsters that could eat David for breakfast. It felt like the world full of dark corners and very little that was bright and happy. Connelly does a middling job explaining what things are and why they are–it would’ve been nice to know a little more because I was left with a lot of questions throughout the book. These aren’t the kinds of things that will trip up most middle grade readers, who are the target audience. The storyline is super basic, I pretty much told you what the plot is already–sorry if that’s a spoiler, but there’s not much I can do about that–a kid running from peril to peril on his journey to the king. The author, John Connolly, is Irish and that flavors his writing style and prose. I found the prose a little clunky and lacking subtlety but again, most 12-year-olds won’t care.
THE BOOK OF LOST THINGS is about young David, whose journey to a grim fairytale land becomes the adventure of a lifetime.
It’s the characters that really move the story along more than the setting and storyline. David’s character arc is realistic and pretty gratifying by the end–it’s for the most part believable. Some of the other characters that he meets such as the woodsman and the knight are important guides as he moves from event to event and place to place. The Crooked Man as our villain was a little contrived, but he still worked decently for the story.
If your middle grade reader likes horror novels like THE SCREAMING STAIRCASE (EBR Review), then they will probably like this book. However, I’m providing thorough warning for parents of tenderhearted tweens, because this will very likely give them nightmares. I am an adult, and I found it very grim reading. The fairytales are indeed quite dark and warped. It might be, in fact, more suitable for older teens, even though the main character is twelve years old. Fortunately the themes of familial love, sacrifice, courage, and forgiveness are what redeems the pitfalls of this story.
- Recommended Age: 11+ but is not recommended for the tender-hearted
- Language: None
- Violence: Death, animal cruelty, lots of fighting and peril
- Sex: Subtle themes of sexuality
Comments
You do realise this is in no way a children’s book, don’t you? I suppose as the subject matter is fairy tales it’s easy for someone to assume it is, but the grimness and ultimate theme (this is about stories and storytelling, adolescence tinged with oedipal fantasy) and the graphic bloodshed should be enough to tell you that this is, as all proper fairy stories are, very much for adults. It is not a middle grade book, however Americans see it. To quote a British review “The torture chambers, martial dismemberments and surgical miscegenations, the continual nervous drift towards themes of sexual corruption: all firmly indicate adults only.”
To quote Connolly himself “So, in the end, I’ve described the book as a book about childhood for adults, which seems about right.”
you *do realize* that the publisher has set this book as young-adult and not reviewer Vanessa right?
A same-sex relationship should not show up to the category of “Sex”. Unless you put heterosexual relationship is all your other book quantifiers, otherwise yer being homophobic.
Actually, that’s not correct, and here’s why.
We don’t include the age/violence/sex/profanity details with each review because we’re trying to warn people away from stuff. We include them so that people know a little better what they’re getting into, in similar nature to the way that movie ratings or associated content inclusions there work. Some readers like books with lots of violence and profanity. Some don’t. Some absolutely think that sex needs to be part of every story because it’s “such a large part of the real world”, but there are also those that don’t like finding a really good book that happens to include all of the sticky details of such encounters.
In this case, I’m personally of the opinion that it matters even a little bit more than normal to have that information as part of this review, because there are parents that aren’t keen on having their tender-aged kids (see the suggested Age above) read books that include homosexual relationships. That’s their opinion and it’s their right to decide how to raise their kids. In this case, we’re including information in our review that other readers can use to determine whether or not to read this book. Or let their kids read it. Also, there are readers that actively go out looking for books with LGBT themes in them.
This information is a tool. That’s all.
At the time, we didn’t have a book category that could be used to find LGBT content. Now we happen to. So, given your comment and that of the previous post, I’ll add the appropriate category to this review and tweak the comments in the Sex content to be a little more accurate in our reporting.
Cheers.